![]() And search, especially combined with the "see also" / related documents functions, is way ahead of anything that's possible on native macOS. I'd say the rules you can create with macOS alone are about as powerful as those you can create within DT, however the interface in DT is far easier and more consistent. It also adds two further dimensions for classification compared to Finder's folders-and-tags-approach, which are called tags and labels. ![]() DT has a automatic classification and see-also-system that is based on text analytics (seemingly something heavily relying on word frequencies and n-grams). With the increased capabilities of Finder and MacOS in general, nowadays, it's a bit harder to justify using DT over just the operating system's capabilities. ![]() I do also use it as a digital office backend (every official or commercial letter I get gets scanned into DEVONthink, for easing tax returns or contract management), but that could honestly also be done with Finder alone. I very much like it, as others have pointed out, for research document storage. This post is going to get downvoted so bad. so almost every piece of software on your Mac), have a much shorter learning curve, be the same amount of work, be cheaper, and you'll get some tools (ulysses, hook, hazel), that you can use for other things.įor everything that DT does, there is a purpose built tool that will do it better, be updated more often, and be easier to integrate with something else down the road. It will work better, integrate with everything that uses Mac files (. Use Hook to to link all the stuff together if you need to, but this is a pro tip. If you want to create logs of what your doing, use something like Ulysses or anything that you like to create text notes in the folder you're using say, to collect tax documents. You have to create groups in DT anyway, so no extra work there (+/- 5 minutes). Tag your documents there (like you have to do in DT), use Hazel to sort stuff into folders. Devonthink is unintuitive, feature-bloated, ugly, and difficult to use. I'm going to bail on this product for good. scanned everything in, tagged everything properly. Used them to file my taxes, my receipts, etc. ![]() Make sure that the filter runs before citeproc.*No.* I have the Pro version, and have all my personal documents in there. Pandoc.read(citationmd, 'markdown').blocks Local citationmd = string.format('', linkstring) local linkstring = pandoc.write(placeholder, 'markdown') What we can do, however, is create a Markdown string that looks the way we'd want it to, and then use pandoc.read to parse it into an AST: local linkstring = (ntents) This isn't quite as straight forward, because citation parsing isn't simple. The updated question mentions the desire to have this treated as a normal citation. The content of RawInline elements is not escaped (if the raw format matches the target format). Where raw is defined as local function raw (s) If the goal is to have unescaped brackets while round-tripping to Markdown, then we'll need to use RawInline elements instead of Str: return raw'' Now, some formats use square brackets as part of their markup, and pandoc will escape them in that case. Pandoc will treat this as if we had written return If link.target:match '^x%-devonthink%-item://' then A simple trick is to wrap strings into tables, as pandoc will then treat them as pandoc.Inlines items and allow to concatenate them to the ntent, which is also of type pandoc.Inlines.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |